affiliate disclosure · We earn affiliate commission on some vendor links. Audits, scores, and rankings are independent — vendors do not pay for placement and do not see drafts. read more →
news · Editorial · 9 min read
Three vendors closed in 12 months — what the COA data showed before they did
Amino Asylum, Peptide Sciences, and Paradigm Peptides each ceased operations under different circumstances. The signals that preceded each shutdown were public, dated, and ignored.
published · · 1 day ago
What we read
The public Janoshik test history for retatrutide, semaglutide, and
tirzepatide samples between December 2024 and April 2026; FDA-cited
court filings for the Paradigm Peptides federal case (December 2025);
contemporaneous r/Peptides threads from the 90 days preceding each of
the three vendor shutdowns; and post-shutdown reporting on
The Peptide Catalog
and Muscle and Brawn.
This is a forensic synthesis, not a first-hand audit.
The shutdown cadence
Three of the top five US peptide vendors by traffic ceased operations
between June 2025 and March 2026 — a roughly four-month cadence at
the top of the market. The closures were not the result of a single
regulatory action; each ended for different formal reasons. The
underlying pattern is what the public data shows in common.
| Vendor | Closed | Cause cited | Pre-warning visible? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amino Asylum | June 2025 | FDA raid; SARMs with testosterone | Partially |
| Paradigm Peptides | Dec 2025 (plea) | Federal charges; SARMs with testosterone | Yes |
| Peptide Sciences | March 6, 2026 | Quality collapse + federal pressure | Yes |
Case 1: Amino Asylum — June 2025
The federal charges that triggered the FDA raid concerned SARMs labeled
products that contained testosterone — a controlled substance under
21 U.S.C. § 802(41). The peptide catalog was not the formal subject of
the action.
Pre-shutdown signals that were visible:
COA practices were inconsistent across product lines, with several
product pages publishing what appeared to be the same generic in-house
certificate dated months earlier than the order.
Multiple r/Peptides threads in early 2025 flagged the SARM-line products
with chemistries that did not match label.
The vendor's response to community challenges was customer-service
silence rather than substantive correction.
Pre-shutdown signals that were not visible:
The internal compliance state that drew federal attention.
The specific SKU that triggered the testing referral.
For an outside observer with only public data, the SARM-line discrepancies
were a yellow flag for at least three months before the raid. Whether they
constituted a predictable signal of a federal action specifically is harder
to claim — federal enforcement timing is not observable from outside.
Case 2: Paradigm Peptides — December 2025
Paradigm's founders pleaded guilty to federal charges in December 2025.
The charge pattern was structurally identical to Amino Asylum:
products labeled as SARMs that contained controlled substances. The
peptide line, again, was not the formal subject of the case.
Pre-shutdown signals that were visible:
Substantially the same SARM-versus-controlled-substance pattern that
Amino Asylum had been raided for six months earlier.
A community-side observation that two vendors with overlapping
founding histories were running similar product lines was made on
r/Peptides in late summer 2025.
The specific learning here is operational, not regulatory: when one
vendor in a category is raided for a specific SKU pattern, vendors with
visibly similar SKU patterns are an elevated-risk pool for the next
12–18 months. The Paradigm closure five months after Amino Asylum's was
predicted, in retrospect, by the structural similarity of their catalogs.
Case 3: Peptide Sciences — March 6, 2026
Peptide Sciences was the most-recommended vendor on r/Peptides for most
of the 2024–2025 window. Their closure was both the largest by reader
impact and the one where the public COA data most clearly anticipated
the shutdown.
The Janoshik record for Peptide Sciences retatrutide samples between
December 2024 and March 2026 shows 37 tested samples with
results that progressively diverged from label claims, including at
least one batch that returned a mass-spec identity result inconsistent
with retatrutide. The community discussion on r/Peptides escalated
through the back half of 2025, with multiple users posting Janoshik
QRs showing under-spec purity on what were marketed as premium SKUs.
Federal pressure followed the quality collapse rather than preceding it.
The shutdown itself happened with little notice but the trailing data
trend was visible to anyone reading the public Janoshik database in
mid-2025.
What the data shows in common
Across the three closures, four signals appeared in some combination:
Sustained adverse Janoshik results on flagship SKUs (visible for
Peptide Sciences; less so for Amino Asylum, where the SARM-line
was the catalyst).
Inconsistent COA cadence — vendors switching between batch-specific
and generic certificates as scrutiny increased.
Customer-service silence on substantive product challenges, replaced
by promotional response patterns.
Catalog overlap with already-actioned vendors in the SARM
category specifically.
None of these is a single-shot prediction. In combination, sustained
across 60–90 days, they constitute a reasonable risk signal for the
audit-side observer.
Reader checklist
If you are about to place a recurring order with a vendor:
Pull the last 90 days of Janoshik public tests for the SKUs you
buy most. If the trend across 5+ samples shows declining purity or
inconsistent identity, treat the vendor as elevated-risk regardless
of their headline COA.
Check if the catalog includes SARMs marketed alongside peptides.
Two of the three closures came through the SARM/controlled-substance
side of mixed catalogs. Pure-peptide vendors carried less of this
shutdown risk in 2025–2026.
Watch customer-service tone on substantive challenges. Vendors
that respond promotionally to specific product questions are showing
a discipline gap that often precedes other discipline gaps.
What we did not read
We do not have access to vendor-internal compliance documentation,
non-public sealed court filings, or the full chain-of-custody for the
Janoshik samples we cite. The next iteration of this piece will benefit
from r/Peptides moderator-side data on which threads were removed for
defamation claims — a useful proxy for vendor-side legal pressure that
is invisible from the reader-facing forum.